Excellent work on this! The problem with all this churn is what is happening in between our snapshots? In theory they could change addresses temporarily to steal people's identity and vote as them then switch the address back without the voter ever knowing.
I agree. There are records that did not show up as being changed in between the snapshots that would NEVER show up in my analysis based no the dates I obtained these.
Without in-person voting, how can anyone be 100% positive a ballot is 100% legitimate. Utilizing data from USPS Intelligent Mail Barcode services the SOS has at her option to Track/Sort/Reconcile(undeliverable, forwarded, etc) data at will by logging into the USPS reporting system. (As I understand it). This is very concerning as it gives informational foresight into Who has/Who hasn’t voted when coded barcodes are placed on ballot mail pieces. This is my research on barcodes. https://truthsocial.com/group/make-america-great-again/posts/111679923788110488
The people responsible for running elections shouldn’t be on the ballots either. It’s like they’ve never heard of a “conflict of interest”. Or maybe they have & don’t care.
the people who are responsible for maintaining the voter rolls should not be the same people responsible for running elections. similarly, the people who recommend the selection and purchase of voting equipment should not be the same people responsible for running elections. too many conflicts of interest.
Oh my! I am getting to the point where I believe the voter rolls need to be removed from the SoS offices and completely taken offline. Handing the precincts paper lists of registered voters not eligible voters and processing ballots within precincts seems to be the only way. Sounds too extreme? That comes after doing something ridiculous, closing a Verizon Wireless account, a few days ago. I unknowingly go to a "corporate" store which they tell me is good (think county clerk's office instead of MVD, NGO, Political Party,...). I tell them to close the account. They tell me they are unable to do that. (Co. Clerks office cannot delete anyone from the voter rolls, done at the state level) I tell them that I receive two copies of the same bill, to the same address every month. (Handling ballots through the mail???) I finally haven't been paying them. They Should be able to see there have been no outgoing transmissions from these two broken phones for over a year and here is $153.02 in cash to close the account which according to the latest correspondence (not a usual bill, those two came the week before) has finally been turned over to "collections". They tell me they can't take the money for the bill because it has been turned over to collections. I tell them the "collections correspondence" directs me to pay to "Verizon Wireless". I finally say I want them to note on the latest bill that I came in to verify that the account was closed. They kindly did. I have a check in the mail to Verizon Wireless in DE with a payment stub generated in PA from Transworld Systems Inc. "tsi". Sorry this is so long. The point of it all is that we are operating in the equivalent of a long distance "stone age" which I believe will become known as the "electronic age". The "electronic age" is very short and worked its way into failure rapidly... The most straightforward way to start getting out of this mess is to unplug voting. EDA, you are a patient saint. Thank you!
part of that history is in a complete voter roll. you can see the last transaction date, as well as the date of original registration, and the last voted date. hope that helps. of course records vary from state to state, etc.
Question for you. If only in person voting were allowed, would you support polling places being open multiple days? Say the first week of November or something similar? Also, a requirement of a certain number of polling places per neighborhood to prevent voter suppression?
That’s a great post. Maryland seems to have it right. I know some places have in person voting more than just one day, and if we go all in person, I think that would be a good trend.
Excellent work on this! The problem with all this churn is what is happening in between our snapshots? In theory they could change addresses temporarily to steal people's identity and vote as them then switch the address back without the voter ever knowing.
I agree. There are records that did not show up as being changed in between the snapshots that would NEVER show up in my analysis based no the dates I obtained these.
Without in-person voting, how can anyone be 100% positive a ballot is 100% legitimate. Utilizing data from USPS Intelligent Mail Barcode services the SOS has at her option to Track/Sort/Reconcile(undeliverable, forwarded, etc) data at will by logging into the USPS reporting system. (As I understand it). This is very concerning as it gives informational foresight into Who has/Who hasn’t voted when coded barcodes are placed on ballot mail pieces. This is my research on barcodes. https://truthsocial.com/group/make-america-great-again/posts/111679923788110488
The people responsible for running elections shouldn’t be on the ballots either. It’s like they’ve never heard of a “conflict of interest”. Or maybe they have & don’t care.
the people who are responsible for maintaining the voter rolls should not be the same people responsible for running elections. similarly, the people who recommend the selection and purchase of voting equipment should not be the same people responsible for running elections. too many conflicts of interest.
Oh my! I am getting to the point where I believe the voter rolls need to be removed from the SoS offices and completely taken offline. Handing the precincts paper lists of registered voters not eligible voters and processing ballots within precincts seems to be the only way. Sounds too extreme? That comes after doing something ridiculous, closing a Verizon Wireless account, a few days ago. I unknowingly go to a "corporate" store which they tell me is good (think county clerk's office instead of MVD, NGO, Political Party,...). I tell them to close the account. They tell me they are unable to do that. (Co. Clerks office cannot delete anyone from the voter rolls, done at the state level) I tell them that I receive two copies of the same bill, to the same address every month. (Handling ballots through the mail???) I finally haven't been paying them. They Should be able to see there have been no outgoing transmissions from these two broken phones for over a year and here is $153.02 in cash to close the account which according to the latest correspondence (not a usual bill, those two came the week before) has finally been turned over to "collections". They tell me they can't take the money for the bill because it has been turned over to collections. I tell them the "collections correspondence" directs me to pay to "Verizon Wireless". I finally say I want them to note on the latest bill that I came in to verify that the account was closed. They kindly did. I have a check in the mail to Verizon Wireless in DE with a payment stub generated in PA from Transworld Systems Inc. "tsi". Sorry this is so long. The point of it all is that we are operating in the equivalent of a long distance "stone age" which I believe will become known as the "electronic age". The "electronic age" is very short and worked its way into failure rapidly... The most straightforward way to start getting out of this mess is to unplug voting. EDA, you are a patient saint. Thank you!
Can you FOIL the registration history records for the registration records in your case studies?
part of that history is in a complete voter roll. you can see the last transaction date, as well as the date of original registration, and the last voted date. hope that helps. of course records vary from state to state, etc.
I fellow researcher has tried and was unsuccessful but I would suggest that for other states.
Good detailed investigative journalism.
Question for you. If only in person voting were allowed, would you support polling places being open multiple days? Say the first week of November or something similar? Also, a requirement of a certain number of polling places per neighborhood to prevent voter suppression?
Thank you, Mark. I have not studied that question. But I can point you here to a related post. https://electiondataanalyzer.substack.com/p/lets-eliminate-election-season
That’s a great post. Maryland seems to have it right. I know some places have in person voting more than just one day, and if we go all in person, I think that would be a good trend.